I’m embarking on a series of posts in which I want to look at what it means to be church in light of Ferguson, Missouri and the killing of Michael Brown at the hand of a police officer (and that this sort of incident is a far too common.) This inquiry assumes much that I’ve written about and be wrestling with here in Ecclesial Longings. Ecclesial Longing emerges from a conviction that Our current understandings of Church among all Protestants does not offer a means to fully live into who we are in Christ. The Believers Church idea of the Free Church was possibly a needed corrective of ways of living into the Body of Christ that were too focused upon two of the four main orders of the Church. However as I have begun to articulate here and here, as a robust theology that takes into account the organic and architectural metaphors of Ephesians it falls short.
AS for this series of posts, it seems to me that American White Protestant (that I can legitimately put all these qualifiers on our identities as Christians should make us uncomfortable) understandings of church do not give us a means to see how the Nation-State desires (demands?) from us the sort of identification we are are only to have with the Body of Christ. The Nation-State co-opts or replaces, sometimes both, the Church. In my view, this is easy to do when we view the church as a non-physical purely spiritual (non-institutional) reality of some vague connection between all individuals who “believe” in Jesus Christ. This is a very weak sense of identity based upon our sense of connection with other individuals are Christians. To my eyes this appears as an atomization of ourselves as members of Christ’s Body, and allows for the Nation-State to pick out the Christian from her proper identity and insert her into the Body of the Nation state without here being aware that of the dislocation or conflicting allegiances. I don’t’ think I’m alone in making some of these observations (Hauerwas comes to mind). What I’d like to suggest is that the higher ecclesiologies represented by Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy have something to offer here. Though, not necessarily in every aspect.
In recent two posts over at Personal Musings I have suggested that the Nation-State is the systemic seat of Racism. I think this is key to understanding how policing (one of the two coercive and violent arms of the Nation-State) remains racist and how then routine policing ends up disproportionately targeting Blacks and people of color.
I want to examine the Nation-State from its emergence in Europe as a state that was for and to govern a particular ethnicity, that is a nation. The boundaries and the State itself in its original idea was for being able to clearly identify the French and the English. This emerged also as a mean to separate from the State of the Holy Roman Empire.
Given in part that this ethic identification of State land and people was in conflict with the Holy Roman Empire, the emergence of the Nation-State in Europe is also an emerging reality out of conflicts between church and state in the late middle ages. I wish to suggest then that there are ecclesiological consequences of the Nation-State, on some level the Nation-State is to replace the role of the Church in it’s unifying function as it was understood in Medieval Europe
I Haven’t yet read Willie Jennings The Christian Imagination: Theology and the Origin of Race , but my from what I know and from lectures I’ve heard of his I think some of what I’m attempting here is related to his analysis in this book.
I will seek to articulate in this series, that Racism is the result of a series of ecclesiological heresies, and thus is as such a an ecclesiological heresy itself. But it isn’t just about ideas, but that these heresies actually hide from us the true nature of the Nation-State and the systems (powers) we take for granted and are told are necessary for our survival and are simply the natural way of things, and the height of our human achievement and progress. When in fact they are inventions, and more to the point spiritually speaking are the same powers that crucified Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ.
I am engaging this inquiry out of the conviction that knowing who we are as the Body of Christ is what will allow followers of Christ to act not out of the systems of the World (that is the logic of the Nation-State the current system of the World), but of the new system/cosmos The Church, the Body of Christ.
Lastly, I recognise that I can’t escape being White. Much of what I write is an attempt to address White heresies. In a sense what I’m doing here is also an attempt at renunciation (see this post on renunciation and privilege) of trust in systems that have and still privilege and benefit Whites. I recognise the possible limits of what I will be exploring. This should not be read then as trying to correct or evaluate theological systems of the African-American Church or Latino/a theology or feminist theology, Liberation Theology and so forth. I would hope some dialogue could ensue, that we can approach this as a means to continue to learn what it means to be the Body of Christ in the World. For myself this line of thought is already followed out of listening to and reading various authors, voices and theological perspectives.