I’m working up some reflections on David Fitch‘s End of Evangelicalism. I have some questions about why one would continue with a particular identity like evangelical, when ones theology is so clearly drawn from such an ecumenical place as David Fitch seems to be coming from. Also, I feel that what the book addresses cuts across any particular Christian identity.
But for the moment only a wetting of the appetite, because I’ve been reading others who are exploring this thing we call the church, or the ecclesia, the Body of Christ. This extended reflection and quest I’ve labeled Ecclesial Longings should at least acknowledge these other bits of ecclesial reflection (possibly with with a bit of comment from me, most of the links here I’ve left comments on the posts themselves.)
We’ll start with some of the articles that responded to the whole controversy Donald Miller sparked by admitting he doesn’t go to church that often.
Justin Harvey‘s Peregrinatio In Defense of Donald Miller. Like the author I’m not terribly concerned about infrequent church attendance. I appreciate that the author saw that the discussion required asking “what is the church?”. I appreciated the basis, but in my comment pushed back at what I was seeing as a reduction and pointed to the more robust picture we find in the metaphor of church as Body, and in the mixed metaphor in Ephesians.
Relevant Magazine interview’s Donald Miller about the controversy: My thought is Donald and Relevant seem to be putting gathering together and community on one side and relationship with God and following Jesus on the other. There’s the affirmation of the importance of gathering and community but say the real thing is having a relationship with God and following Jesus. This parsing of the problem seems to me to lack reflection on church as Body of Christ. My reading of the metaphor of body is to say that having a relationship with Jesus is in being connected with all others who also follow Jesus (granted there’s the question of how this is lived out locally etc., so I understand that not going to a particular “church” isn’t the same as being out of fellowship with the Body). As I see it, this whole controversy (Both Donald Miller’s remarks and those of his critics) shows that we don’t have a clue what we’re talking about and thus why such an extended inquiry and quest, as found here, is needed.
And so we leave the church attendance fiasco.
Then over at [D]mergent (don’t ask) John O’keefe posted Moving out of Ecclesiology, into Koinology . Read it and my comment. If you, reader, want let me know what you think of it and my response. In summary, if I followed O’Keefe I’d rename this thread and quest “Longing for Koinonia”, or “Koinonia Longings”, something like that. I don’t think koinonia and ecclesia need to be pitted against each other. Wait there seems to be a pattern emerging: our analysis tends toward pitting thesis against antithesis. I want synthesis. Why are we stuck in an Hegelian nightmare!
Then over at Hope in Time, Anthony Bartlett’s Nonviolent Bible Interpretation III: Church, as you can see from the title its part of a series on hermeneutics. I don’t know where to begin. I’m sympathetic to Girardian take on things, but I’m not one to take Girard and Mimetic Theory as gospel (as my dad used to say.) So, that isn’t going to be my exclusive hermeneutic lens. Also, I’ll admit I think anti-Constantinianism, that is so fashionable among protestants of just about any stripe, is bunk. Also, if you think you understand what Constantine did, and what it means for the church I think you don’t understand it. So, I’m having difficulty seeing beyond the anti-Constantine bias in order to really evaluate the essay. I know I’m reacting to it, and not really responding.
Lastly over at the Sub-Deans Stall the Irrelavance of Relavance. The Revd Canon Robert Hendrickson comes closest to my own sentiments about church. But I get lost in his various uses of church, and church still then seems a little to much about what we do. However, I agree pretty much completely with what he writes, but I ask what is it that forms such a group of people? Is church then a goal, something that is in process being built? by whom?, by human beings, or by God? Ephesians looms large in my thinking you may have noticed, that may or may not be a good thing.
So that is what I have. This is what thanks largely to Tripp Hudgins I’m engaging with at the moment around the nature of the ecclesia, the Body of Christ.
Have you come across other reflections on the church? Leave a link and your thoughts on the piece if you have.